Image from Google Jackets

Justifying punishment : perspectives from post-Communist Europe / edited by Jakub Drápal.

Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Routledge contemporary issues in criminal justice and procedurePublication details: Abingdon, Oxon [UK] ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2025.Description: 1 online resourceISBN:
  • 9781003470670
  • 100347067X
  • 1040307493
  • 9781040307472
  • 1040307477
  • 9781040307496
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 345.43/0773 23/eng/20240905
Online resources:
Contents:
Reasons for (and against) justifying sentences / Jakub Drápal -- Three Stages of Reason-Giving : Identification, Evaluation and Weighing / Pauline Schuyt, Jakub Drápal -- Sentence justification in first-level courts in post-communist Europe / Jakub Drápal, Augustina Bolocan-Holban, Jaan Ginter, Mojca Plesničar, Kristýna Tomšů, Mihaela Vidaicu -- Sentence justification in first-level courts in post-communist Europe / Jakub Drápal, Augustina Bolocan-Holban, Jaan Ginter, Mojca Plesničar, Kristýna Tomšů, Mihaela Vidaicu -- A Review of Sentence Justification : The case of the Netherlands / Sonja Meijer -- Towards proper sentence justification / Jakub Drápal.
Summary: "This book develops principles of proper sentence justification, presents results of comparative empirical study on sentence justifications in the post-communist countries and provides practical measures to improve the current situation. Providing justification for sentences is an essential feature of any sentencing system that strives to achieve principled practice. Principled sentencing requires factors to be considered as well as explained both individually and comprehensively, in a manner that allows the process of determining the sentence to be reviewed and repeated with a similar result. This work determines why reasoning is relevant and provides compelling evidence in favour of an increased role for justification of sentences, grounded in the best sentencing, legal and psychological scholarship. It further explores how various theoretical and practical obstacles might be overcome. Relatedly, it introduces and expands on Schuyt's novel concept of justifying sentences, which approaches sentence justification in three stages. The authors investigate to what extent these stages are followed in practice in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Moldavia, Slovakia and Slovenia. The results suggest that the quality of sentence justification in these countries is generally low, although there is some variation. The book concludes with suggestions for improving the process and quality of sentence justification. The work will be of interest to those working in the areas of Criminal Law, Criminology, Comparative Law and Legal Philosophy"-- Provided by publisher.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Materials specified Status Date due Barcode Item holds
E-Books E-Books National Library of India Online Resource 345.43/0773 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available EBK000055228
Total holds: 0

Reasons for (and against) justifying sentences / Jakub Drápal -- Three Stages of Reason-Giving : Identification, Evaluation and Weighing / Pauline Schuyt, Jakub Drápal -- Sentence justification in first-level courts in post-communist Europe / Jakub Drápal, Augustina Bolocan-Holban, Jaan Ginter, Mojca Plesničar, Kristýna Tomšů, Mihaela Vidaicu -- Sentence justification in first-level courts in post-communist Europe / Jakub Drápal, Augustina Bolocan-Holban, Jaan Ginter, Mojca Plesničar, Kristýna Tomšů, Mihaela Vidaicu -- A Review of Sentence Justification : The case of the Netherlands / Sonja Meijer -- Towards proper sentence justification / Jakub Drápal.

"This book develops principles of proper sentence justification, presents results of comparative empirical study on sentence justifications in the post-communist countries and provides practical measures to improve the current situation. Providing justification for sentences is an essential feature of any sentencing system that strives to achieve principled practice. Principled sentencing requires factors to be considered as well as explained both individually and comprehensively, in a manner that allows the process of determining the sentence to be reviewed and repeated with a similar result. This work determines why reasoning is relevant and provides compelling evidence in favour of an increased role for justification of sentences, grounded in the best sentencing, legal and psychological scholarship. It further explores how various theoretical and practical obstacles might be overcome. Relatedly, it introduces and expands on Schuyt's novel concept of justifying sentences, which approaches sentence justification in three stages. The authors investigate to what extent these stages are followed in practice in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Moldavia, Slovakia and Slovenia. The results suggest that the quality of sentence justification in these countries is generally low, although there is some variation. The book concludes with suggestions for improving the process and quality of sentence justification. The work will be of interest to those working in the areas of Criminal Law, Criminology, Comparative Law and Legal Philosophy"-- Provided by publisher.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
                                                                           
web counter

Copyright ©2020 The National Library of India, Govt. of India ↔ Hosted by NVLI, MOC ↔ Technology and Design by National Library of India, Ministry of Culture, Govt. of India